Articles Posted in Construction Accident

Updated:

New York Construction Accident Trials-Direct Examination of an Adverse Witness

In this video, New York injury lawyer Ben Rubinowitz demonstrates direct examination by plaintiff’s attorney of an adverse witness. In this example Chris Sallay plays the witness, Robert Hoover, a site foreman with experience in the construction industry. For the fact pattern upon which this is based click on extended…

Updated:

New York Construction Accident Law: ELEVATION RELATED DIFFERENTIALS AND THE REJECTION OF THE SAME LEVEL RULE

By Anthony H. Gair; In Wilinski v. 334 East 92nd Housing Development Fund Corp., 18 N.Y.3d 1, 935 N.Y.S.2d 551 (Ct. Apps. 2011) The New York Court of Appeals rejected The Same Level Rule first enunciated by The Court in Misseritti v. Mark IV Constr. Co., 86 NY2d 487, 657…

Updated:

New York Construction Accident Law- Construction Worker Granted Summary Judgment on 240(1) Claim

On July 31, 2012, our partner, Christopher L. Sallay, was granted summary judgment in a New York Construction accident case pursuant to §240(1) of the New York State Labor Law against the general contractor for the construction project. On October 26, 2008, the plaintiff, a painter, susstained injury when the…

Updated:

Hershenhorn Quoted in Thomson Reuters Article on 2008 Manhattan Crane Collapses

Howard S. Hershenhorn Gair Gair Conason Steigman Mackauf Bloom & Rubinowitz Thomson Reuters, in an article entitled, “Crane collapse trial could be uphill battle for prosecutors” quoted Gair, Gair, Conason, Rubinowitz, Bloom, Hershenhorn, Steigman & Mackauf partner, Howard S. Hershenhorn, on the difficulties of prosecuting the 2008 crane collapses in Manhattan that…

Updated:

Summary Judgment Granted For Construction Worker on 240(1) Claim for Injury in New York Construction Accident

In Kempisty v 246 Spring St., LLC, 2012 NY Slip Op 00901, Decided on February 9, 2012, New York Appellate Division, First Department, The Court modified the decision of the lower Court dismissing the plaintiff’s 240(1) claim to the extent of reinstating the § 240(1) claim and granting plaintiff summary…

Contact Us