Ministerial Versus Discretionary Acts or Omissions in Child Welfare Litigation
Many children in the welfare system suffer personal injury or or are even killed because they weren’t provided with stable and secure care. When a child is harmed while under the care of child welfare services, that child may have a viable cause of action in state or federal court. In the article “Ministerial Versus Discretionary Acts or Omissions in Child Welfare Litigation” recently published in the Capital University Law Review, 44(1), 103-125* Andrea MacIver, J.D., DePaul University College of Law, Appellate Judicial Clerk for the Honorable Nathaniel R. Howse, Jr and Daniel Pollack, M.S.S.A. (M.S.W.), J.D., Professor at the School of Social Work, Yeshiva University in New York City, and a frequent expert witness in cases involving child welfare and developmental disabilities, focus on state claims.
New York Personal Injury Attorneys Blog






ssed this year will include: distracted driving, interaction of side airbags for children in Child Restraint System (CRS) in the back seat, evaluation of side impact for children in CRS in the front seat, optimal recline angle for rear facing CRS and Consumer Report’s new child seat test protocol, efficiency of CRS recalls, LATCH use, Top Tether use, misuse and side impact, accident reconstruction and relation between New Car Assessment Programm (NCAP) and real world injuries.
people died and 4000 suffered
